Regina v R.A.F

[1999] NSWSC 615

Supreme Court of NSW

View on AustLII View on JADE Download

Judges

Sully J, Barr J

Headnote

No headnote yet — we'll generate the full structured AI headnote for you.

Generate the headnote

Free trial · no card required

Case Details

Citation[1999] NSWSC 615

CourtNSWSC

JurisdictionNsw

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

Start free trial

No card · cancel anytime

Judgment

Judges

Sully J · Barr J

Subsequent Judicial Consideration1›

Cases that have considered Regina v R.A.F

Referred to (1)

[2014] NSWCCA 116

Judicial Consideration (Chronological)

[2014] NSWCCA 116Referred to

On an application to set aside a statutory demand under section 459G of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), the Wallaroo-Yorke rule for statutory demands requires the applicant to identify with specificity the offsetting claim relied upon, supported by evidence sufficient to demonstrate a genuine triable issue

On an application to set aside a statutory demand under section 459G of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), the Wallaroo-Yorke rule for statutory demands requires the applicant to identify with specificity the offsetting claim relied upon, supported by evidence sufficient to demonstrate a genuine triable issue.

Regina v R.A.F at [30]

The Hindmarsh-Petrie test for vicarious sub-tortfeasor liability requires the principal to have had actual or constructive knowledge of the sub-tortfeasor's propensity to act unlawfully in the course of the engagement, and that the engagement created the occasion for the wrongful conduct

The Hindmarsh-Petrie test for vicarious sub-tortfeasor liability requires the principal to have had actual or constructive knowledge of the sub-tortfeasor's propensity to act unlawfully in the course of the engagement, and that the engagement created the occasion for the wrongful conduct.

Regina v R.A.F at [37]

Judges

Headnote

Case Details

Built by Barristers,For Australian Law.

Judgment

Subsequent Judicial Consideration1›

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.