Mackenzie v Warringah Council [2002] NSWLEC 131 — BarristerAI

Mackenzie v Warringah Council

[2002] NSWLEC 131

NSW Land and Environment Court

View on AustLII View on JADE Download

Judges

Pain J

Headnote

No headnote yet — we'll generate the full structured AI headnote for you.

Generate the headnote

Free trial · no card required

Case Details

Citation[2002] NSWLEC 131

CourtNSWLEC

JurisdictionNsw

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

Start free trial

No card · cancel anytime

Judgment

Judges

Pain J

Authorities Cited3›

Cases considered by Mackenzie v Warringah Council

Referred to (3)

Marchese Partners Architects Pty Limited v Warringah Council [2002] NSWLEC 31 Kanne Pty Limited v Botany Bay City Council [2001] NSWLEC 163 NSW Associated Blue-Metal Quarries Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [1956] HCA 80

Subsequent Judicial Consideration2›

Cases that have considered Mackenzie v Warringah Council

Referred to (2)

[2014] NSWLEC 95 [2020] NSWLEC 1581

Judicial Consideration (Chronological)

[2014] NSWLEC 95Referred to

[2020] NSWLEC 1581Referred to

Where a party seeks to rely upon an estoppel by convention, the party must demonstrate that the common assumption was shared by both parties and that it would be unconscionable to permit departure from it

Where a party seeks to rely upon an estoppel by convention, the party must demonstrate that the common assumption was shared by both parties and that it would be unconscionable to permit departure from it.

Mackenzie v Warringah Council at [30]

Where a representee establishes that a representation was made with reckless indifference to truth, the Castlereagh-Mornington doctrine of estoppel by representation permits an estoppel even absent proof of detrimental reliance, provided the representor's conduct evinces a settled intention to mislead

Where a representee establishes that a representation was made with reckless indifference to truth, the Castlereagh-Mornington doctrine of estoppel by representation permits an estoppel even absent proof of detrimental reliance, provided the representor's conduct evinces a settled intention to mislead.

Mackenzie v Warringah Council at [37]

Judges

Headnote

Case Details

Built by Barristers,For Australian Law.

Judgment

Authorities Cited3›

Subsequent Judicial Consideration2›

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.