Laurens & Anor v Willers [2002] WASCA 183 — BarristerAI

Laurens & Anor v Willers

[2002] WASCA 183

Western Australia Court of Appeal27 June 2002

View on AustLII View on JADE Download

Judges

Em Heenan J

Headnote

No headnote yet — we'll generate the full structured AI headnote for you.

Generate the headnote

Free trial · no card required

Case Details

Citation[2002] WASCA 183

CourtWASCA

JurisdictionWa

Decision Date27 June 2002

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

Start free trial

No card · cancel anytime

Judgment

Judges

Em Heenan J

Subsequent Judicial Consideration2›

Cases that have considered Laurens & Anor v Willers

Referred to (2)

MIDDLIN-HANNAH v THE QUEEN [2020] SASCFC 112 McElroy v The Queen; Wallace v The Queen [2018] VSCA 126

Judicial Consideration (Chronological)

MIDDLIN-HANNAH v THE QUEEN [2020] SASCFC 112Referred to

McElroy v The Queen; Wallace v The Queen [2018] VSCA 126Referred to

The principle of proportionality in sentencing requires that the sentence imposed bear a reasonable relationship to the objective gravity of the offence, having regard to the maximum penalty prescribed by the legislature as an indicator of the seriousness with which Parliament regards the offence

The principle of proportionality in sentencing requires that the sentence imposed bear a reasonable relationship to the objective gravity of the offence, having regard to the maximum penalty prescribed by the legislature as an indicator of the seriousness with which Parliament regards the offence.

Laurens & Anor v Willers at [30]

Where a guarantor seeks to set aside a guarantee on the ground of unconscionable conduct by the lender, the guarantor must establish both that they were under a special disadvantage and that the lender knew or ought to have known of that disadvantage

Where a guarantor seeks to set aside a guarantee on the ground of unconscionable conduct by the lender, the guarantor must establish both that they were under a special disadvantage and that the lender knew or ought to have known of that disadvantage.

Laurens & Anor v Willers at [37]

Judges

Headnote

Case Details

Built by Barristers,For Australian Law.

Judgment

Subsequent Judicial Consideration2›

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.