R v Musolino No. Sccrm-03-68

[2003] SASC 203

Supreme Court of South Australia30 June 2003

View on AustLII View on JADE Download

Headnote

No headnote yet — we'll generate the full structured AI headnote for you.

Generate the headnote

Free trial · no card required

Case Details

Citation[2003] SASC 203

CourtSASC

JurisdictionSa

Decision Date30 June 2003

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

Start free trial

No card · cancel anytime

Judgment

The principle of proportionality in sentencing requires that the sentence imposed bear a reasonable relationship to the objective gravity of the offence, having regard to the maximum penalty prescribed by the legislature as an indicator of the seriousness with which Parliament regards the offence

The principle of proportionality in sentencing requires that the sentence imposed bear a reasonable relationship to the objective gravity of the offence, having regard to the maximum penalty prescribed by the legislature as an indicator of the seriousness with which Parliament regards the offence.

R v MUSOLINO No. SCCRM-03-68 at [30]

A court exercising federal jurisdiction may grant an anti-suit injunction to restrain foreign proceedings only where the continuation of those proceedings would be vexatious or oppressive and where the balance of convenience favours the grant of relief

A court exercising federal jurisdiction may grant an anti-suit injunction to restrain foreign proceedings only where the continuation of those proceedings would be vexatious or oppressive and where the balance of convenience favours the grant of relief.

R v MUSOLINO No. SCCRM-03-68 at [37]

Headnote

Case Details

Built by Barristers,For Australian Law.

Judgment

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.