Pb v The Queen

[2003] WASCA 183

Western Australia Court of Appeal14 August 2003

View on AustLII View on JADE Download

Judges

Murray J, Parker J, Mclure J

Headnote

No headnote yet — we'll generate the full structured AI headnote for you.

Generate the headnote

Free trial · no card required

Case Details

Citation[2003] WASCA 183

CourtWASCA

JurisdictionWa

Decision Date14 August 2003

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

Start free trial

No card · cancel anytime

Judgment

Judges

Murray J · Parker J · Mclure J

Subsequent Judicial Consideration1›

Cases that have considered Pb v The Queen

Referred to (1)

Mjh v The State of Western Australia [2006] WASCA 167

Judicial Consideration (Chronological)

Mjh v The State of Western Australia [2006] WASCA 167Referred to

The principle of proportionality in sentencing requires that the sentence imposed bear a reasonable relationship to the objective gravity of the offence, having regard to the maximum penalty prescribed by the legislature as an indicator of the seriousness with which Parliament regards the offence

The principle of proportionality in sentencing requires that the sentence imposed bear a reasonable relationship to the objective gravity of the offence, having regard to the maximum penalty prescribed by the legislature as an indicator of the seriousness with which Parliament regards the offence.

Pb v The Queen at [30]

Where a party seeks to rely upon an estoppel by convention, the party must demonstrate that the common assumption was shared by both parties and that it would be unconscionable to permit departure from it

Where a party seeks to rely upon an estoppel by convention, the party must demonstrate that the common assumption was shared by both parties and that it would be unconscionable to permit departure from it.

Pb v The Queen at [37]

Judges

Headnote

Case Details

Built by Barristers,For Australian Law.

Judgment

Subsequent Judicial Consideration1›

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.