DPP v Page; DPP v Corker; DPP v Lynch

[2006] VSCA 224

Victorian Court of Appeal19 October 2006

View on AustLII View on JADE Download

Headnote

No headnote yet — we'll generate the full structured AI headnote for you.

Generate the headnote

Free trial · no card required

Case Details

Citation[2006] VSCA 224

CourtVSCA

JurisdictionVic

Decision Date19 October 2006

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

Start free trial

No card · cancel anytime

Judgment

Where a party seeks to rely upon an estoppel by convention, the party must demonstrate that the common assumption was shared by both parties and that it would be unconscionable to permit departure from it

Where a party seeks to rely upon an estoppel by convention, the party must demonstrate that the common assumption was shared by both parties and that it would be unconscionable to permit departure from it.

DPP v Page; DPP v Corker; DPP v Lynch at [30]

A court exercising federal jurisdiction may grant an anti-suit injunction to restrain foreign proceedings only where the continuation of those proceedings would be vexatious or oppressive and where the balance of convenience favours the grant of relief

A court exercising federal jurisdiction may grant an anti-suit injunction to restrain foreign proceedings only where the continuation of those proceedings would be vexatious or oppressive and where the balance of convenience favours the grant of relief.

DPP v Page; DPP v Corker; DPP v Lynch at [37]

Headnote

Case Details

Built by Barristers,For Australian Law.

Judgment

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.