Latest Cases Case Lookup Research Notebook LegislationSoon BriefsSoon

D&M (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD -v- CROUCH DEVELOPMENTS PTY LTD [2008] WASC 160 — BarristerAI

D&M (Australia) Pty Ltd v Crouch Developments Pty Ltd

[2008] WASC 160

Supreme Court of Western Australia

View on AustLII View on JADE Download

Judges

Beech J

Headnote

No headnote yet — we'll generate the full structured AI headnote for you.

Generate the headnote

Free trial · no card required

Case Details

Citation[2008] WASC 160

CourtWASC

JurisdictionWa

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

Start free trial

No card · cancel anytime

Judgment

Judges

Beech J

Subsequent Judicial Consideration1›

Cases that have considered D&M (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD -v- CROUCH DEVELOPMENTS PTY LTD

Referred to (1)

BRIDE -v- THE REGISTRAR OF TITLES [2015] WASC 11

Judicial Consideration (Chronological)

BRIDE -v- THE REGISTRAR OF TITLES [2015] WASC 11Referred to

Where a representee establishes that a representation was made with reckless indifference to truth, the Castlereagh-Mornington doctrine of estoppel by representation permits an estoppel even absent proof of detrimental reliance, provided the representor's conduct evinces a settled intention to mislead

Where a representee establishes that a representation was made with reckless indifference to truth, the Castlereagh-Mornington doctrine of estoppel by representation permits an estoppel even absent proof of detrimental reliance, provided the representor's conduct evinces a settled intention to mislead.

D&M (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD -v- CROUCH DEVELOPMENTS PTY LTD at [30]

The duty of a solicitor to advise a client of the risks of litigation extends to advising on the prospects of recovery of costs in the event of success, particularly where the opposing party may lack the means to satisfy a costs order

The duty of a solicitor to advise a client of the risks of litigation extends to advising on the prospects of recovery of costs in the event of success, particularly where the opposing party may lack the means to satisfy a costs order.

D&M (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD -v- CROUCH DEVELOPMENTS PTY LTD at [37]

Judges

Headnote

Case Details

Built by Barristers,For Australian Law.

Judgment

Subsequent Judicial Consideration1›

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.