DPP v Bahnert

[2010] VSC 265

Supreme Court of Victoria16 June 2010

View on AustLII View on JADE Download

Judges

Lasry J

Headnote

No headnote yet — we'll generate the full structured AI headnote for you.

Generate the headnote

Free trial · no card required

Case Details

Citation[2010] VSC 265

CourtVSC

JurisdictionVic

Decision Date16 June 2010

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

Start free trial

No card · cancel anytime

Judgment

Judges

Lasry J

An equitable charge over commingled trust funds may be enforced under the Vermilion Quay principle of equitable charge where the trustee has dealt with the funds in breach of fiduciary duty and a sufficient proportion of the original res remains identifiable in the resulting account

An equitable charge over commingled trust funds may be enforced under the Vermilion Quay principle of equitable charge where the trustee has dealt with the funds in breach of fiduciary duty and a sufficient proportion of the original res remains identifiable in the resulting account.

DPP v Bahnert at [30]

Where a representee establishes that a representation was made with reckless indifference to truth, the Castlereagh-Mornington doctrine of estoppel by representation permits an estoppel even absent proof of detrimental reliance, provided the representor's conduct evinces a settled intention to mislead

Where a representee establishes that a representation was made with reckless indifference to truth, the Castlereagh-Mornington doctrine of estoppel by representation permits an estoppel even absent proof of detrimental reliance, provided the representor's conduct evinces a settled intention to mislead.

DPP v Bahnert at [37]

Judges

Headnote

Case Details

Built by Barristers,For Australian Law.

Judgment

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.