Charbel Hanna v 311 Hume Highway

[2012] NSWSC 81

Supreme Court of NSW

View on AustLII View on JADE Download

Judges

Einstein J

Headnote

No headnote yet — we'll generate the full structured AI headnote for you.

Generate the headnote

Free trial · no card required

Case Details

Citation[2012] NSWSC 81

CourtNSWSC

JurisdictionNsw

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

Start free trial

No card · cancel anytime

Judgment

Judges

Einstein J

Subsequent Judicial Consideration1›

Cases that have considered Charbel Hanna v 311 Hume Highway

Referred to (1)

[2017] NSWSC 692

Judicial Consideration (Chronological)

[2017] NSWSC 692Referred to

A court exercising federal jurisdiction may grant an anti-suit injunction to restrain foreign proceedings only where the continuation of those proceedings would be vexatious or oppressive and where the balance of convenience favours the grant of relief

A court exercising federal jurisdiction may grant an anti-suit injunction to restrain foreign proceedings only where the continuation of those proceedings would be vexatious or oppressive and where the balance of convenience favours the grant of relief.

Charbel Hanna v 311 Hume Highway at [30]

The Hindmarsh-Petrie test for vicarious sub-tortfeasor liability requires the principal to have had actual or constructive knowledge of the sub-tortfeasor's propensity to act unlawfully in the course of the engagement, and that the engagement created the occasion for the wrongful conduct

The Hindmarsh-Petrie test for vicarious sub-tortfeasor liability requires the principal to have had actual or constructive knowledge of the sub-tortfeasor's propensity to act unlawfully in the course of the engagement, and that the engagement created the occasion for the wrongful conduct.

Charbel Hanna v 311 Hume Highway at [37]

Judges

Headnote

Case Details

Built by Barristers,For Australian Law.

Judgment

Subsequent Judicial Consideration1›

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.