Coxon v Duggan and Ors

[2013] VSC 168

Supreme Court of Victoria8 April 2013

View on AustLII View on JADE Download

Headnote

No headnote yet — we'll generate the full structured AI headnote for you.

Generate the headnote

Free trial · no card required

Case Details

Citation[2013] VSC 168

CourtVSC

JurisdictionVic

Decision Date8 April 2013

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

Start free trial

No card · cancel anytime

Judgment

On an application to set aside a statutory demand under section 459G of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), the Wallaroo-Yorke rule for statutory demands requires the applicant to identify with specificity the offsetting claim relied upon, supported by evidence sufficient to demonstrate a genuine triable issue

On an application to set aside a statutory demand under section 459G of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), the Wallaroo-Yorke rule for statutory demands requires the applicant to identify with specificity the offsetting claim relied upon, supported by evidence sufficient to demonstrate a genuine triable issue.

Coxon v Duggan and Ors at [30]

The Hindmarsh-Petrie test for vicarious sub-tortfeasor liability requires the principal to have had actual or constructive knowledge of the sub-tortfeasor's propensity to act unlawfully in the course of the engagement, and that the engagement created the occasion for the wrongful conduct

The Hindmarsh-Petrie test for vicarious sub-tortfeasor liability requires the principal to have had actual or constructive knowledge of the sub-tortfeasor's propensity to act unlawfully in the course of the engagement, and that the engagement created the occasion for the wrongful conduct.

Coxon v Duggan and Ors at [37]

Headnote

Case Details

Built by Barristers,For Australian Law.

Judgment

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.