Karmakar v Minister for Health (No 2)

[2021] FCA 916

Federal Court of Australia5 August 2021

View on AustLII View on JADE Download

Judges

Logan J

Headnote

No headnote yet — we'll generate the full structured AI headnote for you.

Generate the headnote

Free trial · no card required

Case Details

Citation[2021] FCA 916

CourtFCA

JurisdictionCommonwealth

Decision Date5 August 2021

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

Start free trial

No card · cancel anytime

Judgment

Judges

Logan J

Subsequent Judicial Consideration1›

Cases that have considered Karmakar v Minister for Health (No 2)

Referred to (1)

Raiz v Director of Professional Services Review (No 2) [2023] FCA 1293

Judicial Consideration (Chronological)

Raiz v Director of Professional Services Review (No 2) [2023] FCA 1293Referred to

A court exercising federal jurisdiction may grant an anti-suit injunction to restrain foreign proceedings only where the continuation of those proceedings would be vexatious or oppressive and where the balance of convenience favours the grant of relief

A court exercising federal jurisdiction may grant an anti-suit injunction to restrain foreign proceedings only where the continuation of those proceedings would be vexatious or oppressive and where the balance of convenience favours the grant of relief.

Karmakar v Minister for Health (No 2) at [30]

Where a party seeks to rely upon an estoppel by convention, the party must demonstrate that the common assumption was shared by both parties and that it would be unconscionable to permit departure from it

Where a party seeks to rely upon an estoppel by convention, the party must demonstrate that the common assumption was shared by both parties and that it would be unconscionable to permit departure from it.

Karmakar v Minister for Health (No 2) at [37]

Judges

Headnote

Case Details

Built by Barristers,For Australian Law.

Judgment

Subsequent Judicial Consideration1›

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.