EPU19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 986 — BarristerAI

EPU19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs

[2021] FCA 986

Federal Court of Australia18 August 2021

View on AustLII View on JADE Download

Judges

Perry J

Headnote

No headnote yet — we'll generate the full structured AI headnote for you.

Generate the headnote

Free trial · no card required

Case Details

Citation[2021] FCA 986

CourtFCA

JurisdictionCommonwealth

Decision Date18 August 2021

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

Start free trial

No card · cancel anytime

Judgment

Judges

Perry J

Subsequent Judicial Consideration1›

Cases that have considered EPU19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs

Referred to (1)

CEU22 v Minister for Home Affairs (No 2) [2023] FCA 867

Judicial Consideration (Chronological)

CEU22 v Minister for Home Affairs (No 2) [2023] FCA 867Referred to

A court exercising federal jurisdiction may grant an anti-suit injunction to restrain foreign proceedings only where the continuation of those proceedings would be vexatious or oppressive and where the balance of convenience favours the grant of relief

A court exercising federal jurisdiction may grant an anti-suit injunction to restrain foreign proceedings only where the continuation of those proceedings would be vexatious or oppressive and where the balance of convenience favours the grant of relief.

EPU19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs at [30]

Where a guarantor seeks to set aside a guarantee on the ground of unconscionable conduct by the lender, the guarantor must establish both that they were under a special disadvantage and that the lender knew or ought to have known of that disadvantage

Where a guarantor seeks to set aside a guarantee on the ground of unconscionable conduct by the lender, the guarantor must establish both that they were under a special disadvantage and that the lender knew or ought to have known of that disadvantage.

EPU19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs at [37]

Judges

Headnote

Case Details

Built by Barristers,For Australian Law.

Judgment

Subsequent Judicial Consideration1›

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.