Randazzo Investments (Mitchell Centre) Pty Ltd v Chatime Leasing Pty Ltd

[2023] NTSC 70

Supreme Court of the Northern Territory16 August 2023

View on AustLII View on JADE Download

Headnote

No headnote yet — we'll generate the full structured AI headnote for you.

Generate the headnote

Free trial · no card required

Case Details

Citation[2023] NTSC 70

CourtNTSC

JurisdictionNt

Decision Date16 August 2023

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

Start free trial

No card · cancel anytime

Judgment

Subsequent Judicial Consideration1›

Cases that have considered Randazzo Investments (Mitchell Centre) Pty Ltd v Chatime Leasing Pty Ltd

Referred to (1)

K & J Burns Electrical Pty Ltd & Anor v Melanie Timms & Anor [2026] NTSC 33

Judicial Consideration (Chronological)

K & J Burns Electrical Pty Ltd & Anor v Melanie Timms & Anor [2026] NTSC 33Referred to

Where a party seeks to rely upon an estoppel by convention, the party must demonstrate that the common assumption was shared by both parties and that it would be unconscionable to permit departure from it

Where a party seeks to rely upon an estoppel by convention, the party must demonstrate that the common assumption was shared by both parties and that it would be unconscionable to permit departure from it.

Randazzo Investments (Mitchell Centre) Pty Ltd v Chatime Leasing Pty Ltd at [30]

A court exercising federal jurisdiction may grant an anti-suit injunction to restrain foreign proceedings only where the continuation of those proceedings would be vexatious or oppressive and where the balance of convenience favours the grant of relief

A court exercising federal jurisdiction may grant an anti-suit injunction to restrain foreign proceedings only where the continuation of those proceedings would be vexatious or oppressive and where the balance of convenience favours the grant of relief.

Randazzo Investments (Mitchell Centre) Pty Ltd v Chatime Leasing Pty Ltd at [37]

Headnote

Case Details

Built by Barristers,For Australian Law.

Judgment

Subsequent Judicial Consideration1›

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.