A party alleging that a liquidated damages clause is a penalty bears the onus of proving that the stipulated sum is extravagant and unconscionable in comparison with the greatest loss that could conceivably be proved to have followed from the breach.
Martin CJ
A party alleging that a liquidated damages clause is a penalty must positively demonstrate that the stipulated amount is extravagant and unconscionable compared to the greatest conceivable loss from the breach. It is insufficient to merely show that the clause was calculated by reference to lost revenue without deducting costs, where the party has not established that the relevant costs were variable and avoidable, or that the innocent party could immediately redeploy its resources.
No headnote yet — we'll generate the full structured AI headnote for you.
Generate the headnoteFree trial · no card required
Legal principles extracted from this case
Free trial — no card required
Cases considered by ACTIVE TREE SERVICES PTY LTD -v- ELECTRICAL RESOURCE PROVIDERS PTY LTD
Referred to (6)
Cases that have considered ACTIVE TREE SERVICES PTY LTD -v- ELECTRICAL RESOURCE PROVIDERS PTY LTD
Judicial Consideration (Chronological)