Tax Practitioners Board v Lamede Group Proprietary Limited (No 2)

Where a party seeks to rely upon an estoppel by convention, the party must demonstrate that the common assumption was shared by both parties and that it would be unconscionable to permit departure from it.

Tax Practitioners Board v Lamede Group Proprietary Limited (No 2) at [30]

Where a representee establishes that a representation was made with reckless indifference to truth, the Castlereagh-Mornington doctrine of estoppel by representation permits an estoppel even absent proof of detrimental reliance, provided the representor's conduct evinces a settled intention to mislead

Where a representee establishes that a representation was made with reckless indifference to truth, the Castlereagh-Mornington doctrine of estoppel by representation permits an estoppel even absent proof of detrimental reliance, provided the representor's conduct evinces a settled intention to mislead.

Tax Practitioners Board v Lamede Group Proprietary Limited (No 2) at [37]

Judges

Headnote

Case Details

Built by Barristers,For Australian Law.

Judgment

Authorities Cited1›

Subsequent Judicial Consideration3›

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.