Latest Cases Case Lookup Research Notebook LegislationSoon BriefsSoon

Authorities Cited — R v Egan [2016] NSWCCA 285 — BarristerAI

←Back to Case|R v Egan

Authorities Cited Subsequent Consideration

Authorities Cited42

Cases considered by R v Egan

Referred to (42)

R v Egan [2016] NSWCCA 2852016 R v Zolfonoon [2016] NSWCCA 2502016 R v Dashti [2016] NSWCCA 2512016 R v Mulligan [2016] NSWCCA 472016 CMB v Attorney General for New South Wales [2015] HCA 92015 [2014] NSWCCA 402014 [2014] NSWCCA 1832014 [2014] NSWCCA 532014 [2014] NSWCCA 562014 SW v Regina [2013] NSWCCA 2552013 Reeves v The Queen [2013] HCA 572013 Bugmy v The Queen [2013] HCA 372013 [2012] NSWCCA 2492012 RLS v R [2012] NSWCCA 2362012 [2011] NSWCCA 2292011 [2011] NSWCCA 2352011 Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen [2011] HCA 492011 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 392011 Nicholas v The Commonwealth [2011] HCA 292011 AWKO v R [2010] NSWCCA 902010 Hili v The Queen; Jones v The Queen [2010] HCA 452010 R v Ronald KING [2009] NSWCCA 1172009 Kite v Regina [2009] NSWCCA 122009 REGINA v Phillip Ronald SPIERS [2008] NSWCCA 1072008 Cahyadi v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 12007 MLP v R [2006] NSWCCA 2712006 [2005] NSWCCA 802005 Markarian v R [2005] HCA 252005 REGINA v CRAMP [2004] NSWCCA 2642004 R v AJP [2004] NSWCCA 4342004 Regina v Fidow [2004] NSWCCA 1722004 R v Carter [2003] NSWCCA 2432003 R v CHRISTOFF [2003] NSWCCA 522003 REGINA v SIMPSON [2001] NSWCCA 5342001 R v Kaliti [2001] NSWCCA 2682001 REGINA v KAMA [2000] NSWCCA 232000 Dinsdale v R [2000] HCA 542000 In the Matter of the Attorney General's Application (No 1) Under s26 of the Criminal Appeal ACT; R v Ponfield; R v Scott; R v Ryan; R v Johnson [1999] NSWCCA 4351999 Bugmy v R [1990] HCA 181990 Griffiths v R [1977] HCA 441977 Power v R [1974] HCA 261974 House v R [1936] HCA 401936